![]() The level 10 TLS produces 1,140 population, +145% supply, and +250% coin. The other considerations are the other productions of the GBs. A TLS with levels of 10, 4, 5 respectively produce the same 44 goods with the same space requirement for only 3,520 FP! … less than half the FP cost!!! At level ten, DR produces 44 goods for a cost of 7,480 FP. This means that TLS produces goods at a cost of 141 FP per good but DR costs 170 FP per good! Clearly the combination of TLS is greatly more efficient! When at level 10, TLS produces 59 goods at a total FP cost of 8,310 and DR produces 44 goods at level 10 for a FP cost of 7,490. The TLS combination takes 68 spaces and the DR combination takes 67 spaces…so close I’m considering them as having the same space requirement. Let’s compare a combination of ToB, LoA, and SMB (TLS) with a combination of Dresden and RAH (DR). The common wisdom is latter age buildings are better than earlier age buildings…with goods production that just isn’t the case. However, if you have limited space you have to pick and choose which GBs to build and should maximize your benefit per space and per FP spent. If you have easy access to more expansions and space isn’t an issue for you then the best strategy is to build all the goods producing Great Buildings (GB) and level them all fairly evenly to maximize the good produced per FP cost. Unless you’re a diamond player, you’re probably like me and always looking for more efficient use of space. executive summary): The combination of ToB, LoA and SMB uses the same space as a Dresden plus a RAH but produces more goods, is much more space efficient and costs drastically less FP per good. Goods: A case AGAINST Dresden and Royal Albert HallīLUF (i.e.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |